Can a Property Owner Be Held Liable for a Crime Committed on Their Premises?

Jump To Section

Home ยป Blog ยป Can a Property Owner Be Held Liable for a Crime Committed on Their Premises?
Hollis Law Firm
LEGALLY REVIEWED BY:
Managing Attorney
Last updated on August 17, 2026
NADC logo
Super Lawyers

A locked gate, a working light, a guard who actually walks the property. These small details often decide whether a crime on someone else’s land was preventable or simply bad luck, and that distinction matters a great deal if you were hurt because of it.

At Hollis Law Firm, we help people in Kansas and Missouri understand when a property owner can be held responsible for a crime that happened on their land. Ownership alone does not create liability, but a documented history of ignored risks often does, and untangling that history is where our work begins.

What Makes a Property Owner Liable for a Crime on Their Property

Property owners generally owe visitors what the law calls a duty of care, meaning they must take reasonable steps to keep the premises safe. This duty applies to landlords, business owners, and property management companies alike, though the specific obligations can shift depending on who is visiting and why.

That duty does not automatically make an owner responsible every time something bad happens. Courts typically look at whether the owner knew, or reasonably should have known, that a crime was likely to occur. When that risk exists and the owner does little or nothing to address it, a case for premises liability may follow, whether the property is a rented apartment, a retail store, or a venue hosting a large public event.

How Foreseeability Determines Liability in These Cases

Foreseeability sits at the center of nearly every negligent security claim. A property owner cannot be expected to stop every possible crime, but the law may hold them accountable when warning signs were present and ignored. This is often the hardest part of a case to prove, and it is also where an experienced lawyer can make the most difference.

Courts have looked at several recurring factors when weighing whether a crime was foreseeable. A pattern of similar incidents on or near the property can point toward foreseeability, as can a documented history of complaints that went unaddressed. Some factors that may come into play include:

  • Prior incidents: A history of assaults, robberies, or break-ins on the same property or in the immediate area.
  • Timing: How recently similar crimes occurred, since older incidents may carry less weight than recent ones.
  • Frequency: Whether similar crimes happened often enough to establish a pattern the owner should have noticed.
  • Similarity: Whether the type of prior crime closely resembles what happened to you, since courts often weigh this heavily.
  • Notice: Whether the owner knew or should have known about the risk, based on complaints, police reports, or their own records.

No single factor guarantees an outcome on its own, and courts weigh them together based on the specific facts of each case. This same foreseeability standard applies whether the setting is a quiet apartment complex or a crowded event like a music festival with known security gaps, which is why building a strong claim usually requires digging into records that are not always easy to access without legal help.

Common Security Failures That Lead to Preventable Crimes

Many negligent security cases trace back to a handful of recurring problems. Poor lighting in parking lots and stairwells, broken locks on doors and gates, and a lack of working security cameras all create conditions where crime becomes more likely. Crime prevention researchers with the Seattle Police Department have identified lighting as the single biggest deterrent to nighttime crime, which underscores why a dark parking lot or stairwell is more than a minor inconvenience. When an owner is aware of these gaps and fails to act, the resulting harm can potentially form the basis of a claim.

Apartment complexes, retail stores, hotels, and parking garages are common settings for these cases, largely because they attract regular foot traffic in areas that are not always well monitored. A landlord who ignores repeated requests to fix a broken security gate may be creating the same kind of preventable risk we see in landlord liability cases involving known dangers to tenants, where the property owner had notice of a hazard and failed to act on it.

What to Do if You Were Hurt Due to a Property Owner’s Negligence

If you were injured by a crime that happened on someone else’s property, documenting what you experienced can help preserve your options later. Photos of broken locks, missing lights, or unsecured entrances, along with any police reports filed after the incident, can become valuable evidence. It also helps to write down what happened while the details are still fresh, including any prior warning signs you may have noticed or heard about from others.

Property owners and their insurers often have more resources to investigate and respond to a claim than an individual does on their own. Working with a premises liability lawyer can help level that playing field, particularly when it comes to obtaining security footage, police records, or maintenance logs before they disappear.

Talk to Hollis Law Firm About a Negligent Security Claim

Being hurt because a property owner ignored a known risk can leave you facing medical bills, lost wages, and a lot of unanswered questions about what happens next. Our lawyer at Hollis Law Firm has a history of helping clients in Kansas and Missouri work through these cases and pursue fair compensation from the parties responsible for their safety.

We are ready to listen to what happened and help you understand your options moving forward. If you believe negligent security played a role in your injury, contact our office today to discuss your case with our team.

Author
JASON CHAMBERS, JD
Hollis Law Firm

As the managing attorney at the Hollis Law Firm, Jason Chambers leads complex product liability and personal injury litigations, advocating for clients injured by defective drugs, medical devices, and personal injury accidents. The firm, based in Kansas City, represents victims throughout the Midwest and beyond, offering free consultations to those affected by harmful prescription drugs, defective medical devices, and personal injuries.

Jump To Section
Free Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

Terms & Conditions

I understand that no attorney-client relationship exists without a specific retainer agreement between myself and this firm. We welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Neither the completion of an intake nor the submission of any other information to this law firm constitutes the establishment of an attorney client relationship. No attorney client relationship will exist between us without a specific written retainer agreement between you and this firm. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

800-701-3672
800-701-3672
800-701-3672
800-701-3672
800-701-3672
Hollis Law Firm
8101 College Blvd, Suite 260
Overland Park, KS 66210